Sunday, December 28, 2008

Wall Street Journal Letter to the Editor: Feds Should Reimburse Madoff "Victims" 60% of Funds

The Wall Street Journal had the audacity to print a letter from Daniel Hirsch of New York City who argues that since the government will already owe the “victims” restitution in the form of tax refunds, the Government (read: US taxpayers) should compensate these innocent victims who thought it was possible to receive 10-15% returns even when the market is taking the biggest dump in history.  He writes:

 

The government should help fund an immediate shareholder settlement of at least 60% of the investor's net principal investment in exchange for complete legal and tax absolution including Securities and Exchange Commission and other government agency liability related to this investment.  Having the government stand behind the integrity of the U.S. financial market is a show of good faith world-wide. In addition, the money advanced by the settlement would be a spur to the economy and place a number of individual lives and charitable foundations in order.

 

Nice try, Daniel, but believe me, this has no chance of ever getting approved.  The schadenfreude that most Americans feel at seeing the ultra rich get swindled is just too great.  If these people really need money, I suggest they go to cash4gold.com.  I’m sure they’ll get an excellent return on their “gold, diamonds, and other fine jewelry.”

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

High Tech, Nigerian Style

Per my post below, I've been in communication with a Nigerian scammer who preys on craigslist sellers. I've gotten bored, so I thought I'd see if I could contact Nigerian officials. First off, I checked out their Supreme Court's website. You know you’re a third world country when the Supreme Court’s website gets hacked, and the hackers leave a calling card. Check this out:

http://www.scn.gov.ng/portal/news.php

Then I looked at the Federal Ministry of Justice home page. It's headed by Michael Kaase Aondoakaa. Check out his bio here. It's a scanned copy of a crumpled piece of paper, complete with staples. I'm guessing his secretary wasn't hired for her office skills.

It looks like Nigerian is using one of those "one laptop per child" computers with the hand crank battery to design and maintain their website.

Hey Madoff Employees - Time to Update those Linkedin Profiles!

The Wall Street Journal had an article today stating that investigators are examining the role of Frank DiPascali.

Authorities are trying to determine who helped Mr. Madoff carry out what they say appears to be at least a 30-year scheme that may have caused at least $50 billion in losses. They are seeking information from the accounting firm that handled Mr. Madoff's audits for decades and are examining the role of Frank DiPascali, who dealt with client accounts and worked at Mr. Madoff's firm for more than 30 years, said a person familiar with the matter.

"If you wanted anything, a new account, money in, money out, you called Frank," said one Madoff investor. "Nothing moved in that office without him, operationally," this person said.

After Madoff’s arrest, SEC investigators questioned DiPascali, and he claimed he didn’t know who was responsible for clearing and settling trades on the investment-advisory side of the firm. The article went on to state “Investigators are looking at the roles that may have been played by members of the tightknit Madoff family. Mr. Madoff's brother, two sons and a niece worked at the firm, but not in the investment-management business where the alleged fraud occurred. Andrew Madoff had money invested with his father and received the same account statements as other clients, according to a person briefed on the matter.

I’ve highlighted “account statements” for a reason. Currently, it appears that Bernard Madoff would have people believe that he alone was responsible for the fraud. But logistically, it would be impossible. There had to be a very complex software application that generated the fake account statements, showing imaginary trades, which were being sent to some of the most savvy investors in the world. I think DiPascali is going to be the first of many names that are involved with this fraud. It would probably be interesting to talk to their Chief Information Officer.

I looked up Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities on Linkedin and found titles such as portfolio manager, trader, quantitative analyst, and equity trader. One employee, Josh Stampfli, had the title of “head of automated market making.” He described himself as follows: “I am head of the automated market making group at Bernard Madoff – very high volume/frequent quant/algo computerized equity trading.” Something tells me Josh is going to be updating his bio soon. Another profile in need of a quick update is Larry Birch, who proudly describes his role as “Director of Sales and Marketing at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC.” Portfolio manager Reed Abend states “I currently run a long/short equity, options and futures portfolio” at Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities. Here’s Peter Tiletnick’s explanation of his role as “Trader- Proprietary Portfolio Management Unit”:

• Worked amongst portfolio managers to provide equity, options, and futures executions for all proprietary strategies.

• Assisted in risk management, hedging, and the development of portfolio strategy/structure on the desk.

• Supported a high turnover market neutral mean reverting quantitative algorithm by assisting in accounting reconciliation, trading, and thesis generation.

Retained a clear working knowledge of back office operations (Pete: you may want to edit this to “retained a fuzzy working knowledge) and market structure with a moderate comprehension of financial statement analysis.

Madoff’s company was such a deliberately complicated mess that it’s likely these people were in fact conducting trades for the legitimate side of the business, with no knowledge of the fraud, and I feel bad for them. Having Madoff Securities on their resumes is like the mark of cain, and they’re now in one of the toughest job markets in decades, especially for the financial industry.

Monday, December 22, 2008

SonicCameras Appears to be Getting Desperate

Soniccameras, a website that is committing fraud over the Internet, now lists the Canon XH-A1 for $899.  A good deal, from a legitimate reseller, is around $3,000.  There is no way on earth that soniccameras will actually sell this camera for anywhere near this price.  They are getting away with absolute fraud, enabled by Google adwords.  The State of New York’s Attorney General does nothing.  I’ve been watching them for awhile and I’ve never seen such a ridiculously low, unrealistic price advertised by them.

 

They are getting sloppy. Their home page lists the following:

We, at SonicCameras.com, have decided to create an "economic stimulus" package of our own. We're reducing prices on an unprecedented number of items. Scroll down for a sampling of some incredible deals and visit our website at for thousands of "economy-friendly" prices !!

 

They blatantly stole this from KEH.com (which has a mediocre resellerrating as noted here):

 

We, at KEH.com, have decided to create an "economic stimulus" package of our own. We're reducing prices on an unprecedented number of new and used items. Scroll down for a sampling of some incredible deals and visit our website at www.keh.com for thousands of "economy-friendly" prices !!

 

Notice the type on the soniccameras website where they’ve simply removed the URL for KEH.  If you came across this post while searching to find out if soniccameras is legitimate, I can tell you they are not.  They are run by criminals who run a bait and switch operation, and there is an indication that they are also committing credit card fraud.  Do not deal with them, ever.  A wise man once said “libel ain’t a tort if it’s true.”

Friday, December 19, 2008

Epson V500 Scanner

I recently had a friend post some pictures from college on my Facebook page. He, like several of my other fraternity brothers, had lost all of their photos in the Oakland Hills fire, and a friend had scanned and emailed him some of his photos from our fraternity days. I thought it would be cool to put up a site where everyone from our era at the house could upload their photos so that the guys that had lost theirs could recreate their albums. While I had planned to do it, the catalyst for me occurred when I came across a huge box filled with my family photos that my wife had stuffed in a closet. From 2000 (when our first child was born) until 2004 we took photos using a film camera. All of the photos on my computer are from 2004 forward. I want to add all of the film rolls into my computer, so I bought an Epson V500.

I received my Epson V500 scanner yesterday from B&H Photo (perfect transaction with no issues). I’ll continually update this post as I use the scanner, but here are my thoughts so far:

1. Software Installation: As directed, I installed the software prior to plugging in the scanner’s USB connection and power cable. Unfortunately, I did not unplug my old Epson printer/Scanner, and this created a big problem. During software installation I got a blue screen of death, telling me I had a “Bad Pool Caller.” I still have no idea what this is. Once I restarted the computer, unplugged the old Epson printer, and reinstalled the software, everything was fine.

2. Digital Ice: Numerous posters on the Internet say that Digital Ice does a great job of removing dust. I scanned several slides and there was still lots of dust. After doing a bit of research on the Internet I learned that Digital Ice does not work in Full Auto Mode. Once I switched to Home Mode, and selected Digital Ice, it worked fine.

3. Speed: Scanning negatives is slow, but I am able to do two strips of four negatives at once. Scanning photos, on the otherhand, is very fast, and you can do three 4 x 6 photos at a time. I read in a post on the Internet that there is no need to set the DPI higher than 300 when scanning photos, since that is the DPI of commercially developed photos. I’m not sure if this is true, but I scanned a photo at a much higher dpi and it didn’t seem to make much of a difference. Scanning a negative at 300 dpi looks good, but when you zoom in you see pixels. At 4800 it looks excellent, but the file size for seven photos, at 6608 x 4144 pixels, is a HUMUNGOUS 78.34 MEGABYTES. It took 34 minutes to scan 7 negatives (on two sheets) at 4800 dpi. I then lowered it to 1200 dpi. It still took 22 minutes.

4. I like “Home Mode” better than “Full Auto Mode” because you get a preview in Home Mode, and you can de-select photos that you do not want.

5. Storage: I took an old 120 gig hard drive I had lying around and put it in an external enclosure that I got at Fry’s. In settings, I sent all the photos there, so that I don’t clog up my computer’s hard drive with huge photos. I’m going to burn backups to DVDs as well. I named the hard drive “scanned photos,” and since it’s external, I can take it other computers and load the photos.

Update: 1/28/2009: I've now scanned over 2,000 photos, but I'm not done yet. When I finish (which should be in about a week), I'll provide a complete summary of my experiences with the V500.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Thoughts on Blue-Ray

I’ve been rather adamant that I’d never buy a Blue-Ray player.  Even with price cuts, the cheapest ones are close to $200, and I just don’t see the point.  I’ve never thought “Gee, this DVD just isn’t crisp enough.”  The leap from VHS to DVD was monumental, whereas DVD to Blue-Ray is incremental, and the disks cost too much.

So I’m at Circuit City tonight buying a HD tape for my new Canon HV30 High Definition Camcorder and they had a Blue-Ray version of the most recent Batman movie on a plasma screen.  I’ve got to admit, it was freakin’ AMAZING. The actors almost looked three dimensional.  It’s a huge upgrade over DVDs. 

Given current economic conditions, Blue-Ray has an uphill battle trying to gain acceptance, and Internet downloads would appear to be the future of film distribution.  But if you haven’t seen a Blue-Ray disk yet, I recommend checking it out.

I’m still not buying one though.  I haven’t rented a DVD in over a year, and since I don’t like seeing a movie twice, I don’t buy movies.  I just don’t need another piece of hardware in my entertainment console.  But that picture sure was nice…

Monday, December 15, 2008

Microsoft Uses Google Adwords to Promote...Microsoft Live Search

Microsoft is aggressively promoting its Live Search, even offering cash back to users.  Still, I was a little surprised to see them use Google’s sponsored links to advertise their search.  The following appeared as a sponsored link:

 

Canon Digital Rebel

Get cashback on Canon Digital
Cameras. Search Now and Save!
Search.Live.com/cashback

 

Google is the dominant search engine, and you could say that Microsoft is simply acknowledging this fact in attempting to generate growth, but it just seems strange to me to do it in a way that contributes revenue to a mortal enemy.

New Fake Price Comparison Site: RightBuyDigital (rightbuydigital.com)

I just did a search for a Garmin Nuvi 760 and a very sketchy looking price comparison site popped up as a sponsored link, offering it for $229.  Once I clicked on it, it listed 86th Street Photo, Broadway Photo, and Prestige Camera as the merchants offering the Nuvi 760.  These are the exact stores that lowpricedigital.com has listed (lowpricedigital is another fake price comparison site) and these websites have the lowest ratings possible on resellerratings, indicating that they do not actually sell the items for the advertised price.

 

The rightbuydigital site has no contact information, and very little information about the company.  The domain was registered in July 2008.  The following is from their “About Us” page, which shows up as a cached page in Google, but which is no longer available from their home page:

 

About Us

Welcome to RightBuyDigital.com, the industry innovator in the comparison shopping market. We have built our website with new and innovative technologies to make online shopping an informed, and pleasurable experience. RightBuyDigital.com is dedicated to helping you find the best product for your needs by delivering value added services including merchant ratings, product pictures and specifications.

 

Now look at the same page on everyprice, a fake price comparison site:

 

Welcome to EveryPrice.com, the industry innovator in the comparison shopping market. We have built our website with new and innovative technologies to make online shopping an informed, and pleasurable experience. EveryPrice.com is dedicated to helping you find the best product for your needs by delivering value added services including merchant ratings, product pictures and specifications.

 

Mission Statement from RightBuyDigital:

To provide consumers with ALL information needed including where to buy, lowest price and detailed reviews. In order to make an educated decision of what product would best suit their needs while staying in their budget

Mission Statement from Everyprice:

To provide consumers with ALL information needed including where to buy, lowest price, and detailed reviews. In order to make an educated decision of what product would best suit their needs while staying in their budget.

 

Everyprice is a shill for Broadway Photo, and is most likely operated by them.  The prices advertised are fake, and you will not get the item for the advertised price.  Avoid any merchant listed on rightbuydigital at all costs.

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Buying a Garmin Nuvi

I’ve noticed that a lot of people that have left comments on this blog have been trying to shop for a Garmin Nuvi GPS navigation system.  I took one of their top of the line models, the Garmin Nuvi 775T and put it in Google.  The results that were returned were not very helpful, and included some of the bait and switch sites.  Most of the links did not have a price listed, so it took a lot of clicking.

 

I then tried the same thing with Live search.  It took one click to get to their list of resellers (which you should be able to see here.)  The lowest price was from Beach Camera, and it came in at $505.51 after the Live Search rebate was factored in.  Beach is legit, per reseller ratings, which you can see here

 

Please note, however, that you really have to watch the search results closely. I just used Live Search to purchase an Epson V500 Scanner.  It’s on sale at Staples for $199, and it was listed on one Internet deal site for $179, which is a good deal.  I found it through Live Search for $137.15 (The price was listed at $139.95, minus $2.80 cash back.) However, after I clicked through, the price was $179.95, minus a $20 mail in rebate.  It will end up being around $157, and there was no tax and free shipping.  A good deal, but not the price advertised in Live Search.

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Telephoto Zoom Lens

I’m in the market for a Canon lens for my digital rebel.  I’ve settled on the above model.  It’s got image stabilization and a decent zoom.  I’m in no hurry to buy it, so I’m going to track the prices on the web, and update this post periodically.  Right now, using Live search, the lowest price is at Adorama, a legitimate reseller.  The price is $455.85.

 

Wal-Mart has the same lens on their website for $549.84, which they list as a discount off the normal price of $549.84.  Stay tuned.

Thoughts on Microsoft's Search Strategy

Microsoft’s “Live Search” has roughly 9% of the US search market, according to this article from August.  This takes into account Microsoft’s very aggressive cash back program.  They’ve signed up various sites, including eBay, in an attempt to lure customers.  As an example, if you perform a search for an item at www.live.com, an eBay sponsored advertisement will appear.  Once you click on it, you’ll see a “Live Search cashback” link.  Currently, you can get 8% back on some items.  This seems like a pretty expensive way to get customers, and there is no guarantee that users won’t immediately go back to using Google after getting the discount.

 

I tested Live Search, searching for popular camera and video equipment.  None of the Brooklyn Bait and Switch shops showed up.  Buydig was a sponsored link, offering the camera for $589, which is a really good deal.  Out of 1,309 reviews on resellerratings.com, BuyDig had a very respectable 7.88/10 rating.

 

Next I searched for a Canon digital EOS 50D.  A link for “cashback offers” appeared.  J&R had the camera for $1,299 with 7% cashback, bringing it down to $1,208.89.  The same camera in Google revealed fake prices from www.diduprice.com, www.shopcartusa.com, www.soniccamers.com, and www.digitalsaver.com, as well as legitimate adds from Bestbuy and Costco.  BestBuy has the camera on sale for $1,489.99.  Thus 4 out of 6 of the Google sponsored links were fake.

 

The Canon Xl H1 was only $4,364 after a 3% rebate from Adorama.  Hopefully this link will work.  A search for this video camera on Google returns mostly fraudulent offers.

 

Microsoft Live Search is definitely a much better way to search for camera and video equipment.  None of the scam websites show up, and you can get cash back.  I’m not sure if this is because Microsoft has a strict policy, weeding out the fraudulent sites, or if it’s because these websites simply don’t bother advertising on Live Search.  In any event, you’re much better off with Live Search right now.  If I were Microsoft, I would use this as a differentiator with Google, since Google clearly does not care who advertises on their site, as long as they receive money from the clicks.

 

(No, I’m not getting paid by Microsoft, nor am I a Microsoft fanboy.  I’m just fed up with Google.  I’ve contacted their execs numerous times about this problem and they completely ignore me.  Their sponsored links have been hijacked by conmen.)

Friday, December 05, 2008

In-Depth Analysis of diduprice.com, shopcarusa.com, and digitalsaver.com

Check out these links for interesting articles on some popular scam websites:

http://sheddingsomelight.com/buy-cameras/cameras-taleoftwo.html

http://sheddingsomelight.com/buy-cameras/cameras-taleofthree.html

Satriani v. Coldplay

I just read that Joe Satriani has filed a lawsuit against Coldplay, accusing them of plagiarizing a song of his, “If I Could Fly.” He said that Coldplay’s big hit, "Viva la Vida" had "copied and incorporated substantial original portions" from his track, which he released in 2004. Coldplay just got seven Grammy nominations.

When I first read this, I have to admit I rolled my eyes. I’d never heard “If I Could Fly,” and Viva La Vida is such a unique song, and monster hit, that I thought he must have a baseless lawsuit. Out of curiosity, I searched in the iTunes store for “If I Could Fly,” and listened to the preview. And guess what? It sounds EXACTLY LIKE VIVA LA VIDA. Not remotely like it, but EXACTLY like it. If you heard Satriani’s version in the elevator, you’d think it was the Musak version of the Coldplay hit.

Coldplay will probably argue that they never heard it, and it was just a coincidence. Check out this on YouTube and you decide.